Trying to predict Trump administration actions really
is like Kremlinology, updated for the age of social media. There’s
clearly no formal policy process; Donald Trump acts on impulse and
intuition, often shaped either by whoever he last met or what he last saw
on Fox News, making no use of the vast expertise he could call on if he
were willing to listen. Those of us on the outside, and from all
accounts, even many people within the administration try to infer what’s
coming next from tweets and statements by people presumed to be in favor
at the moment.
So what does Trumplinology suggest right now? That
Trump really, really wants to end the economy’s lockdown very soon. Early
Monday Trump tweeted out an assertion
that he has the power to overrule state governors who have imposed
lockdown orders — which suggests that we may have a constitutional crisis
brewing, because as far as anybody knows he has no such power. Meanwhile,
in an interview with The New York Times, Peter Navarro, Trump’s trade
czar, argued
that a weak economy might kill more people than the virus.
The thing is, as far as I can tell epidemiologists are
united in the belief that it’s far too soon to be considering any
relaxation of social distancing. The lockdowns across America do seem to
have flattened the curve, allowing us to avoid — just — completely
overwhelming the health care system. New cases may have peaked. But you
don’t want to let up until you’re in a position to do so without giving
the pandemic a second wave. And we’re nowhere close to that point.
So where’s this coming from? I’ve seen some people
portray it as a conflict between epidemiologists and economists, but
that’s all wrong. Serious economists know what they don’t know — they
recognize and respect experts from other disciplines. A survey of
economists found almost unanimous
support for “tolerating a very large contraction in economic activity
until the spread of infections has dropped significantly.”
No, this push to reopen is coming not from economists
but from cranks and cronies. That is, it’s coming on one side from people
who may describe themselves as economists but whom the professionals
consider cranks — people like Navarro or Stephen
Moore, who Trump tried unsuccessfully to appoint to the Federal
Reserve Board. And on the other, it’s coming from business types with
close ties to Trump who suffer from billionaire’s disease — the tendency
to assume that just because you’re rich you’re also smarter than anyone
else, even in areas like epidemiology (or, dare I say it, macroeconomics)
that require a great deal of technical expertise.
And Trump, of course, who was planning to run on the
strength of the economy, desperately wants to wish the coronavirus away.
The reality is that we shouldn’t consider opening the
economy until we have both reduced infections dramatically and vastly increased
testing, so we can crack down quickly on any potential re-emergence.
Nenhum comentário:
Postar um comentário